A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of established inhabitants. Based on the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted beneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment with a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the right posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-higher water all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth in the dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they were being meant to Get visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Among the most striking descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Situations posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these actions were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant from the authorized timeline.
With the core in the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was authorised and intrudes into guarded land. They Irish Times article about René Collier argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has long been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their action is enthusiastic by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public view, insisting in its place that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply just wanting to establish a loved ones dwelling in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed dependant on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times post about René Collier noted that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on scheduling and environmental difficulties, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-large h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by way of midsection-high water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the Actual physical reality from the coastline along with the symbolic character of your act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much approach.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Still the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other extensive following the legal prices are paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, even so the implications of the case prolong beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. In addition it underscores how swiftly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partially crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.